Jemma Beale : CPS Witnesses

CPS Witnesses

Witnesses form an important element of the evidence given in cases of this nature. They provide third-party evidence to shed light on events and the character of those accused.

Aside from Police, the evidence from expert and 'public' witnesses called upon for the prosecution in this case, actually supported Jemma's version of events; apart from the three key 'public' witnesses we highlight. As you read the below, it is clear to see why they would all testify against Jemma; there are obvious motives. It is not clear why the court chose to believe all of their versions of events and could well have been down to the fact Jemma’s character had been destroyed by some of the media at this stage.

Find out more about each of their stories:

Anuska Pritchard

Ex-Girlfriend

Disgruntled ex-partner who sold her story to the press before the trial ended.

In over 2 years of "knowing the truth", she never went to the Police about an "innocent man in prison".

View The Facts

Samantha Pritchard

Ex-In-Law

The women who states "I came to the conclusion that Jemma had lied about that allegation" (Cassim).

No confession from Jemma, not told of any confession by Anuska, just Samantha's conclusion.

View The Facts

Ben Stonehill

Ex-Boyfriend

The apparent "ex-boyfriend" having sexual intercourse with Jemma when was 14 years old.

Too young to legally consent, but deemed as consensual sexual activity with a male, the platform for two of the perjury charges against Jemma.

View The Facts

Mail

The Ministry of Justice allow prisoners who maintain their innocence to use the internet through a third party to make serious representations about their innocence. Jemma Beale was wrongly convicted of perjury and perverting the course of justice on 6th July 2017 and received a 10 year prison sentence. Murderers and child killers have received shorter sentences.

This website is the only official representation for Jemma and the content is managed by her friends and family. The majority of information contained on this site is already in the public domain, the evidence, having been given in an open Court of Law.

Where information is referred to that was not admitted in evidence at the trial, it is from official statements and documents received from the defence solicitors acting on behalf of Jemma during the trial.